(University of Vienna)
ABSTRACT: In his famous paper “Language as Thought and as Communication” Sellars argued (perhaps implicitly against Grice) that language should primarily be viewed as a form of expression of conceptual thought and not as a vehicle for communication (Sellars 1969). However, he also suggested understanding expression of thought and thought itself in a way which makes language prior to thought. This presents a package of answers to two separate questions. First, whether we can understand language and linguistic meaning in expressive, non-communicative terms (Sellars) or whether they’re somehow essentially communicative or audience-directed (Grice, Davidson)? Second, whether language is prior to conceptual thought and can explain it (Sellars), whether conceptual thought is prior to language and can explain it (Grice, Lewis), or whether they’re somehow on a par (Davidson)?