{"id":509,"date":"2024-04-24T15:25:34","date_gmt":"2024-04-24T15:25:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/?page_id=509"},"modified":"2024-09-05T09:33:46","modified_gmt":"2024-09-05T09:33:46","slug":"cfp-philosophical-anthropology-and-biology-between-history-and-evolution","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/?page_id=509&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Philosophical Anthropology and Biology: Between History and Evolution"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column]

Conference Details<\/h2>

This conference is supported by the Czech Science Foundation Reframing Philosophical Anthropology: Searching for an Anthropological Difference Beyond the Nature\/Culture Dichotomy (GA23-05374S), by the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Hradec Kr\u00e1lov\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Conference venue: Philosophical Faculty, University of Hradec Kr\u00e1lov\u00e9<\/p>\n

Address: n\u00e1m. Svobody 331\/2, 500 02 Hradec Kr\u00e1lov\u00e9, Czech Republic<\/p>\n

Conference date: 11-12 September, 2024<\/p>\n

The organising team:<\/p>\n

Filip Jaro\u0161 (University of Hradec Kr\u00e1lov\u00e9)
\nMatteo Pagan (Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa\/EHESS Paris)
\nMichal Hub\u00e1lek (University of Hradec Kr\u00e1lov\u00e9)<\/p>\n

Motto of the conference:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe human is carried by living nature; no matter how spiritual he may be, he remains subjugated to it. From nature he draws the strength and material for any sublimation whatsoever. This is why the call for a philosophical anthropology automatically includes a call for a philosophical biology.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2013Plessner, The Levels of the Organic and the Human, p. 71.<\/p><\/div>

\"about\"\"about\"<\/div><\/div>
<\/i><\/a>
<\/div><\/i><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>[vc_empty_space][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/4″][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/2″][vc_btn title=“Programme Here“ style=“classic“ shape=“square“ color=“black“ size=“lg“ align=“center“ link=“url:https%3A%2F%2Funi.uhk.cz%2Fjaros%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2024%2F09%2FaaaPhilosophical_Anthropology_and_Biology_Conference_A5_2-1.pdf“][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/4″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_empty_space height=“100px“][vc_custom_heading text=“Keynote Speakers“ font_container=“tag:h3|text_align:center“ google_fonts=“font_family:Open%20Sans%3A300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C600%2C600italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C800%2C800italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal“][vc_empty_space][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/3″][vc_single_image image=“515″ img_size=“medium“ alignment=“center“ style=“vc_box_circle_2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Hans-Peter Kr\u00fcger
\n<\/strong>\u00a0(Universit\u00e4t Potsdam)
\n<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/3″][vc_zigzag color=“black“ css_animation=“rotateIn“][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/3″][vc_single_image image=“561″ img_size=“225×225″ alignment=“center“ style=“vc_box_circle_2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Phillip Honenberger<\/strong>
\n(Morgan State University)[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_empty_space height=“100px“][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=“About the Conference“ font_container=“tag:h2|text_align:center“ google_fonts=“font_family:Open%20Sans%3A300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C600%2C600italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C800%2C800italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal“][vc_empty_space][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/2″][vc_custom_heading text=“Aim and Theoretical Background“ font_container=“tag:h3|text_align:center“ google_fonts=“font_family:Open%20Sans%3A300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C600%2C600italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C800%2C800italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal“][vc_column_text]The aim of the international workshop\u00a0Philosophical Anthropology and Biology: Between History and Evolution<\/em>\u00a0is to find a new answer to the old question: who is the Human and what does it mean to be human? In what position is the Human in relation to other organisms on Earth? Can we philosophically think of the animal as a category, or do we need a nuanced approach to different species and entire taxa? How does the\u00a0Umwelt<\/em>\u00a0term resonate with current approaches to the interaction between an organism and its environment? The basic framework for the relevant considerations will be the approaches of the leading thinkers of Philosophical Anthropology, who had an overlap with the biological disciplines, or whose disciplinary background was directly based on them (Plessner, Buytendijk, Portmann, Goldstein, Grene).<\/p>\n

Philosophical anthropology as a specific paradigm was founded by a lecture given by Max Scheler in Darmstadt on the theme of\u00a0Sonderstellung des Menschen<\/em>\u00a0(\u201cThe Special Position of the Human\u201d) in 1927. The founders of this movement believed that while animals fully belong to the sphere of nature and their behavior is subject to firm rules, Human is characterized by the sphere of culture (associated with symbols, the use of language, morality), where free acts are possible, as opposed to instinctive behavior. At the same time, they wanted to distinguish themselves from the adherents of German idealist philosophy, which posited an unbridgeable gap between the human being and the natural world. Therefore, the goal of German philosophical anthropology was to stress the anthropological difference not through the identification of a specific ontological element, but through the determination of the qualitative difference that presents human\u2019s relationship with the sphere of life. In other words, the human differs from the relational mode that characterizes other living beings and, in particular, animals. In this framework, many philosophers used Uexk\u00fcll\u2019s concept of\u00a0Umwelt<\/em>\u00a0precisely to describe the operational context of animal being, that is, to elaborate the theoretical background from which to determine (by opposition) the human\u00a0Sonderstellung<\/em>. Uexk\u00fcll\u2019s thought, which is characterized by a substantial continuity between human and animal, was thus employed against his intentions to draw a clear distinction between the environmental constraint of animals (Umweltgebundenheit<\/em>) and the openness to the world (Weltoffenheit<\/em>) of humans. Similarly but not identically, Scheler, Plessner, Gehlen, Buytendijk and Portmann emphasized then the closed nature of animal environments, to which they opposed the human capacity to open up to the world.<\/p>\n

During the second half of the 20th century, philosophical anthropology became a mainstream philosophical movement and, thanks to its interdisciplinary reach, it now plays a significant pedagogical role in university philosophy departments. At the same time, however, as it drew closer to other disciplines in the humanities, its links to biological sciences (the backgrounds of Plessner, Buytendijk, and Portmann were in academic biology) weakened, just as their development began to rapidly increase. An effort to update the foundations of philosophical anthropology in light of results from current comparative cognitive research was clearly shown in 2014 when the Helmuth Plessner Award was given to Michael Tomasello. Tomasello holds a naturalistic perspective, but as he includes the emergence of phenomena such as normativity and the use of symbols in natural history, his methodology does not exclude approaches from the humanities. However, the comparative cognitive project of searching for the anthropological difference has been questioned by certain representatives of cognitive ethology (de Waal), cultural primatology (Boesch), and biosemiotics (Magnus & Kull), through the phenomenon of animal cultures. In assessing the relevance of these objections, one must also consider that Uexk\u00fcll\u2019s concept of\u00a0Umwelt<\/em>, which is foundational to philosophical anthropology\u2019s theory of life, came to be inspirational for both classical ethology and, in recent decades, for biosemiotics, which has gained significance in biological research. In the process, new potentials of this model have been revealed, as have new questions, and the interpretation of humans living in an \u201copen world\u201d and animals being closed in a species-specific environment has been increasingly questioned.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/2″][vc_custom_heading text=“Methodology and Research Topics“ font_container=“tag:h3|text_align:center“ google_fonts=“font_family:Open%20Sans%3A300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C600%2C600italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C800%2C800italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal“][vc_column_text]Based on this historical and theoretical background, the workshop\u00a0Philosophical Anthropology and Biology: Between History and Evolution<\/em>\u00a0will create an interdisciplinary platform for discussing the intersections and tensions between philosophical anthropology, philosophical biology, and evolutionary approaches. The interdisciplinary focus of the workshop calls for a plurality of methodological approaches: a) the cultural-historical perspective of philosophical anthropology, b) evolutionary approaches going beyond neo-Darwinism (e.g. extended evolutionary synthesis, biosemiotics, evolutionary anthropology), c) empirical findings from developmental and comparative psychology, as well as cognitive ethology.<\/p>\n

The contributions should tackle some of the following research questions:<\/p>\n

a) Philosophical anthropology: past and present<\/u><\/p>\n

What do Plessner, Buytendijk, Portmann, Goldstein, Grene and other proponents of Philosophical Anthropology say about animals and humans? How do these approaches differ from Uexk\u00fcll\u2019s original formulation of the animal\/human environment (Umwelt<\/em>)? Is it possible to formulate the concepts of philosophical anthropology and philosophical biology independently of the findings and theories of the evolutionary approaches? In what relation is Plessner’s concept of eccentric positionality to the empirical approaches of the cognitive and social sciences?<\/p>\n

b) Anthropological difference<\/u><\/p>\n

In what ways exactly does the human differ from the rest of the animal kingdom, and what impact does this difference have on our understanding of the human? Is it useful to look for an ‚anthropinum‘, i.e. a single constitutive human characteristic? How are exceptionally human attributes (e.g., language, rationality, morality, cumulative culture) related? Does it still make sense to hold the nature\/culture dichotomy in the case of humans? What is the relationship between evolution and history in the search for the biological precursors and relatives (e.g. Neanderthals) of humans?<\/p>\n

c) Developmental and comparative approaches<\/u><\/p>\n

What is the relationship between the theoretical foundations and empirical findings of current anthropogenesis programmes (e.g. Tomasello, Laland)? What do they bring that is new in relation to the program of philosophical anthropology? Are they burdened by a preconceived notion of the cultural and cognitive superiority of Homo sapiens (vs. de Waal’s evolutionary cognition)? What does the discovery of so-called animal cultures mean for philosophical anthropology? Do we have the philosophical concepts to think about the degrees of sociality in different animal species?[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/4″][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/2″][vc_btn title=“Programme Here“ style=“classic“ shape=“square“ color=“black“ size=“lg“ align=“center“ link=“url:https%3A%2F%2Funi.uhk.cz%2Fjaros%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2024%2F09%2FaaaPhilosophical_Anthropology_and_Biology_Conference_A5_2-1.pdf“][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/4″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_empty_space height=“100px“][vc_custom_heading text=“Keynote Speakers“ font_container=“tag:h3|text_align:center“ google_fonts=“font_family:Open%20Sans%3A300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C600%2C600italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C800%2C800italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal“][vc_empty_space][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/3″][vc_single_image image=“515″ img_size=“medium“ alignment=“center“ style=“vc_box_circle_2″][vc_column_text] Hans-Peter Kr\u00fcger \u00a0(Universit\u00e4t Potsdam) [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/3″][vc_zigzag color=“black“ css_animation=“rotateIn“][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/3″][vc_single_image image=“561″ img_size=“225×225″ alignment=“center“ style=“vc_box_circle_2″][vc_column_text] Phillip Honenberger (Morgan State University)[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_empty_space height=“100px“][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=“About the Conference“ font_container=“tag:h2|text_align:center“ google_fonts=“font_family:Open%20Sans%3A300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C600%2C600italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C800%2C800italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal“][vc_empty_space][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=“1\/2″][vc_custom_heading text=“Aim and Theoretical Background“ font_container=“tag:h3|text_align:center“ google_fonts=“font_family:Open%20Sans%3A300%2C300italic%2Cregular%2Citalic%2C600%2C600italic%2C700%2C700italic%2C800%2C800italic|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal“][vc_column_text]The aim of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"fullwidth-page.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-509","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=509"}],"version-history":[{"count":54,"href":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/509\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":597,"href":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/509\/revisions\/597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uni.uhk.cz\/jaros\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}